Following
exactly the same economic philosophy of UPA government at the centre that
inspired it to deregulate the price of petrol, NDA government very recently
left the determination of diesel prices to the mercy of market. Notwithstanding
certain explicit gains visible at a glance in the immediate term, this move
will become catastrophic in the long term on account of two reasons. First and
foremost, this policy is based on the traditional economic philosophy that
unfettered competitive market is the best mechanism to achieve efficiency in
the distribution of resources. Therefore, government must not intervene in the
functioning of the market through subsidy or taxation so that both producers
and consumers will be free to enter and exit such a market. This kind of
freewheeling system will supposedly determine efficiency and therefore,
government can get rid of the head-ache caused by subsidy and consequent
macroeconomic implications.
However,
the champions of this philosophy knowingly or unknowingly neglect several
important factors that reign the market for petroleum products. Among them, the
most crucial thing is either negligence or ignorance of the fact that market is
like a scissor with two blades equal to each other in all respects. The true
purpose of a scissor can only achieved if it is designed keeping in view the
compatibility of two blades to each other. Therefore, even if we accept the
view that market alone can guarantee efficiency, for the sake of argument
(because truth is that market alone cannot work efficiently as has been proved
time and again, for e.g. US economic crisis in 2008 and also considering our
metaphor of scissor, it will not cut on its own if somebody does not make use
of it), a close look at the existing market for petroleum products shows that
it is like a broken scissor. That is, two sides of the market namely demand and
supply is suffering from fatal shortcomings. Let us consider the demand side first. With
this new policy government of India wanted to make market for petroleum product
like petrol and diesel competitive as well as unfettered. Of course, that is
the way government must have gone to achieve the goal of making a market
competitive to the extent possible. However, the designer of the scissor should
pay attention to the design of one blade while designing the other one so as to
avoid incongruity. Here what we have seen is complete neglect on the part of
government to look into other side of the market, supply side, while designing
Indian demand side of the market for petrol and diesel.
What
I mean is that the supply side of petroleum products is completely out of the
control of Indian policy makers and it is fully controlled by international
oligarchs which are best examples of the imperfect markets. Thus, our
government is preparing ground here to make it perfectly competitive on the
demand side while the supply side is imperfectly competitive in toto. In other
words, government of India is striving to design only one blade (demand) of the
scissor under its control in a perfect manner to enable it to deal with a
broken and often self-indulgent other blade (supply) of the scissor like oil
producing and exporting countries (OPEC). The ultimate result can be easily
presumed that perfect blade will be blunted in the process of dealing with the broken
blade and finally the system will collapse and people of India will only be
true losers.
Of
course, as I pointed out at the outset, there would be certain fringe benefits
in the short term in connection with this deregulation. As reported widely in
news papers, given the opportune timing of the introduction of this policy at a
time when international oil price was falling, this move has immediately
resulted in the decline in the price petrol. However, we have to wait and watch
to bear the true brunt of this policy.
It is here, the second important factor namely geopolitics in the Middle
East comes to picture. Nobody believes that dust in the Middle East air will
settle soon especially in the face of an ongoing violence and if Middle East
politics is on fire, so will be the economics of crude oil. Thus, the
deregulation policy of union government will be put into test in the days to
come and if ongoing volatility in the Middle East explodes further, government
will have to review its current policy decisions at some point of time in
future. After having said all these methodological and philosophical lacunae, I
acknowledge that nobody can justify wastage of public resources disbursed in
the form of subsidy to undeserving segment of the society. Therefore, looking
in that way, this policy is a welcome step provided that government ensures
that subsidy reaches the needy as market would not take care of the issue of
equity. Also government must pay attention to reduce India’s reliance on
imported energy products for which plenty of available domestic sources with an
emphasis on renewable energy sources must be tapped.
No comments:
Post a Comment